DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=SB
	Euuw/n78Ir2ub4Tzn2vlGJVZzD+3Srr69P4oX8vT6F906AuYTte2jNkxZ0fj9Rxu
	y/xjPy6iKIrWLxZDhVmvAOPq6a4VfHtLK1m5oQJRnl4mqdrj6HFHXYvCIk6F2Xif
	6VT46lPhym5JnCg5H5v3+KRCGog6twpHMgCWO6Jjs=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5509C7DB.4040708@tiscali.co.uk>
References: <5509C7DB.4040708@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:55:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEhDDbCH2-0LB+yQK+F3HJ6Wg73wyrrub9nWfSSxx_Lrk=aQ=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin svn vs. TortoiseSVN?
From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@gmail.com>
To: cygwin list <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:45 PM, David Stacey  wrote:
> I have a PC with both Cygwin and TortoiseSVN.

Using both Cygwin svn and TortoiseSVN on the same repo is problematic.
Even if you don't run into locking problems, the "native" line-ending
differs (Cygwin's svn uses LF, TortoiseSVN uses CR LF). I've had these
problems in the past :(

Csaba
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple