X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=gj6b98JpwR848C60Do8LN+AiE7SvKXM9n7ia1LETwkv
	aSmvna8Hz8kDz4EN/gZZdhLIUIX5+uUtFXGwnfsphLVKkn838jAVwfRYg5nyLwX3
	Hu/zGOKyTLHFS6sc/cMK9XyWvcWy4z4DY77HUw++JTsV9b0Af5ISzvYl4+Wx52sc
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=kxtoxZxOo9QxBw5bHhpL+yO4yzw=; b=WpVoIcY/zmCM4EDIm
	eoMTeCLIcQXsqKT54qU6UeeG4fE8yG8neOnUm4QmyWKVicgmxS3CqqWMZMlKcCIR
	5KUCt9DK/I3/5VYU5Pz+Ke6MvT4avz7EViWcM0E/kS/TIWA7ETpo10E9+IF6jspg
	eCmsnRq/5OWj/weyZpHg91KPSU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wg0-f51.google.com
X-Received: by 10.180.104.66 with SMTP id gc2mr75899439wib.34.1425648354178;        Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:25:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F9AADB.1010502@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:25:47 +0100
From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [32bit] Xwin 1.17.1.0 broken ?
References: <54F8A393.6020206@gmail.com> <54F99B84.7060509@gmail.com> <54F99FE8.9090503@dronecode.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <54F99FE8.9090503@dronecode.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 3/6/2015 1:39 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 12:20, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> On 3/5/2015 7:42 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>> last Xwin seems to have broken debug symbols and
>>> it segfaults very early.
>>>
>>> 64 bit version has debug symbols, and it seems to work fine
>
> Sorry, it seems that the debug symbols were broken by compression on 32
> bit.
>
>> As I see no reply, I suspect it is a new performance of my
>> BLODA Symantec antivirus.
>>
>> On 32 bit, I am starting to see crazy fault.
>> And I just noted a curious dll injection.
>
> This seems likely.  Google suggests injecting sysfer.dll seems to be
> something Synamtic does.
>
> I can't reproduce the segfault.
>
> I hope that there would be other reporters if this wasn't a problem
> local to your machine, but perhaps I am being optimistic.

I just run a Symantec update and the issue seems gone ...

crossing finger.

Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

