DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=Zz+mmqVdR5nsvBEiuWqyim6Nyz8xtGBDK8uz0u5G3xt
	Kzf4a87ZzRMrjlFCEDlfLh5o2diQ/XHusRqL8veI9JxO7g0kZTLmQnllQHsBrbY6
	Z58O7PNvMOo0PBF98IAuIbTnmZHL12yrySZSEi4ttTToMBYAIf4o81HIAAy2IN7c
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <54F347FF.4040106@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:10:23 +0100
From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gnupg packaging bug?
References: <54F22463.5080407@cornell.edu> <54F2E34E.7080707@gmail.com>	 <20150301100939.GA3213@calimero.vinschen.de> <54F2F876.3060708@gmail.com> <1425221317.8604.3.camel@cygwin.com>
In-Reply-To: <1425221317.8604.3.camel@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 3/1/2015 3:48 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-03-01 at 12:31 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote:

>>
>> So it seems that gnupg 1.4x is looking for the deprecated 0.1 API,
>> not sure it is really worth.
>
> Even on Fedora, there are still a number of packages which have yet to
> be ported to the 1.0 API, so don't let this stop you.
>
> --
> Yaakov
>

1.4.19-2 on the way

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple