X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=IwsfF18MyIKuK68BpxiXarXvsW5GU
	9Ks/KVc3AUpyzmZUV/YlH+1PmEt2dfwtMeBhNtY4Qfny6S1FIb6snr/Uh+vftYj6
	k9S1H1ItAqdH1b9KkGopbdI9LH59Sg1FDvWDGgZnELnEFToW87FWE6aLHH9JK7Y5
	N69EMFssPBbKXk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=t6ldRlP2Y9AqepDH8ivv0j48Q4E=; b=P/l
	NciPnj3+vDHnS7LPXKLWvNOZRNKlQQ7ydU13e3eZdq/gKDhwvaGKrvkxJ80TN4MH
	aS3m7CUAtqwPYQIUsbyZhS/HEVX+y1mHInB9yztOYW3fyxOXp8AHw/Rb4EVavwFF
	3piRA+gNlZ53vi2pK5JJJ4caSLxcqYUvxPDIjKrE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DCBQB5sOVU/5NdJa1bgwZSWgSDBL09giqFcQIcfEMBAQEBAQF8hA0BAQQjEVUCAQgaAgYgAgICMBUCAQ0CBBuIJw26CphDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARUEgSGJboQ9OIJoLoEUBY9Eg1qGfoMQizCDPiKCAhyBUG+BRH8BAQE
From: "Dennis Hagarty (dehagart)" <dehagart@cisco.com>
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Very slow Cygwin startup on Windows 7
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:49:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE275A7@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F0E8@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <87mw4nugdx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F137@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <869208266.20150210030528@yandex.ru> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE263B8@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <20150218111515.GL8493@calimero.vinschen.de> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE26DE4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <20150218125429.GN8493@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150218125429.GN8493@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t1J9nKd8004750

Hi Corinna,

>>>Can you please try this test version without cygserver, and with
>>>the passwd and group settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf set to
>>>
>>>  passwd: db
>>>  group: db
>> 
>>> It would be very interesting to know if this improves the situation for you.
>> 
>> Just did it for 1.7.35-0.2 - I haven't seen 0.3 turn up at a mirror site yet.

>It's only just uploaded so it might take another while, depending
>on your mirrors.  According to Roger's results in
>https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00511.html and
>https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00543.html, the real problem
>hadn't been fixed in the 0.2 test release, so you might give 0.3
>another chance.

BTW - I did try ADInsight, but it didn't show me anything (maybe because this is a 64 bit windows?)

Anyway, I ran it with 0.3 and nsswitch = db and the result is???

1.68-1.72 seconds

With nsswitch = files db it was 1.43-1.45 seconds.

With nsswitch = files it was 0.13-0.14 seconds

(It seems basically the same as 0.2)

Regards
Dennis


