X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=hD8v60fDenc0qYmIt089e/e+1Bbrk
	/Y4544UYDgkvqe8OiYWQqRCOjMXJII6kqnykfUKdMjyFiecPyR6KoZJ/TEv9vfIS
	GE0bdkp9Byr3pYtdLsnN5UD7XEyqm9l6QnkE04z+GwHwz2gxYf2hm0GNGP3E+TmB
	dw2fpvOEhH3G8Q=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:mime-version; s=default; bh=Z6jlc9x0Jpx5WiMlBxWp4FoQNpo=; b=xZI
	dBye/wR5oEDuJTteQWkkOytXkodWnBTGQ8m5yR0Yv4bS2YASzpYq6LlQxDQya5zL
	sZJTYn1INusCmYez6LCM1T7eSR+n5h0VXx5mtsa8CCaXr8eOaLjTDr1og1MlLHX4
	Z264KRG7M35cLC212Uf5Ld8RyT3lhseLIdsgUw/U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,CYGWIN_OWNER_BODY,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: alln-iport-7.cisco.com
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DSBQCcB9lU/5BdJa1cgwZSWgSCfr1RgiaFcQIcgQBDAQEBAQEBfIQMAQEBBCMRUQQCAQgRBAEBAQICBh0DAgICMBQBAgEFCAIEEwiIJQ2ySJYaAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSBIY4AJjgGgmIugRQFjxuDUIZ0gwOCRowPIoNub4EDQX4BAQE
From: "Dennis Hagarty (dehagart)" <dehagart@cisco.com>
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Very slow Cygwin startup on Windows 7
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:17:50 +0000
Message-ID: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F1A0@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F0E8@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <87mw4nugdx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F137@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <20150209185129.GH5633@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150209185129.GH5633@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t19JQPVs008459

Thanks :-)

I saw that, but it didn't quite sink in that this was my problem.

Cheers
Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
Sent: Monday, 9 February 2015 19:51
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Very slow Cygwin startup on Windows 7

On Feb  9 18:18, Dennis Hagarty (dehagart) wrote:
> >> Well, nsswitch.conf was a good suggestion - I'd left it as the default
> >> (which is empty), but I added a 'files' entry and it came good again.
> >> Changing the passwd and group entries to 'files db' makes it very slow
> >> again.
> >
> >Limit the number of entries that Cygwin fetches from the DC.  Also,
> >starting a cygserver would help.
> >
> >> Not sure what changed here, I have a very good connection to my DC,
> >> but obviously something wrong here now.
> >
> >You may be surprised at how slow a DC really can be when it sees some
> >load, regardless of connection speed when you try to fetch several
> >thousand entries.  If I were to try a 'mkpasswd -d' on our DC I'd
> >usually have to wait about an hour with very little network traffic to
> >show (the resulting file would be about 4MiB).
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Achim.
> 
> Thanks Achim - I've recreated my passwd and group files to be sure.
> I checked some domain lookups and they take a second or two for each entry - quite slow. 
> 
> So, I'll leave nsswitch where it is for now and I've started cygserver.
> 
> But I'm just wondering how this failed after I updated - I was using it successfully 30 mins previously.
> I've had it configured this way for years.

https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-02/msg00009.html

It helps to read the announcements ;)


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

