DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=dYEhbsjWvCDLqkiAyVu1kHYPJfUm/0onVirHeQDo2jDiBwjsSjsz8
	UaDlmEsSyPCMSLMzVVfi53xKuDf7XyPNo5QEJlsDsiM4Lo8tCRba6eMMETYPz0ln
	ZY6x2W7FOOLyR7DyM9UJKKZ8aZJrGLIvD3sehoNt8WnAMCHcMRNpcE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:38:26 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Using signals to unblock calls to msgrcv() in a multi-threaded process (Cygwin v1.7.33)
Message-ID: <20150120093826.GW3122@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <6E8492D726F2EA4D8D5418F55704603F01028679FF24@THSONEP02CMB02P.one-02-priv.grp> <20150119103842.GD10055@calimero.vinschen.de> <20150119162105.GR3122@calimero.vinschen.de> <20150119191000.GT3122@calimero.vinschen.de> <54BD5F1A.1050205@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AFQGHouA0VN8Ovbt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54BD5F1A.1050205@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--AFQGHouA0VN8Ovbt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jan 19 20:46, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 1/19/2015 8:10 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>=20
> >
> >Well, it was not as complicated as I anticipated.  I applied a patch
> >to cygserver to pull it into the wonderful modern times of per-thread
> >signalling.  I created and uploaded a new developer snapshot to
> >https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ with this change.
> >
> >Please give it a try and report back.
>=20
> the latest snapshots solve a long standing issue with postgres
>=20
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140202181323.8089.65410@wrigleys.p=
ostgresql.org

Excellent, so the patch fixed more than one problem.  I'm wondering how
many applications using XSI IPC were affected by this long-standing bug.


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--AFQGHouA0VN8Ovbt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=F58G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AFQGHouA0VN8Ovbt--