DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=ifhjVwf4taukBAj0CVPWTNunGa52GwP6jV/7/jzbxf5bdhezB92kh
	BxCIjV0PWDtXzNeXnDsDOK9Th+36m0bJO1yHvgruRhJFV/r13jutR7uXyKJyx9AB
	lgu8PTIxO2RdkQy5GTCPPs8S/PJCFCamT4QIddL8KzOD/rs/Wfnj7U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:58:15 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Cygwin AD schema and configuration extensions (was Re: RFC: 1.7.33 problem with user's home directory)
Message-ID: <20141126215815.GE9157@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20141110205216.GJ2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <0B8D23F7-0258-472D-BF38-860402FD3CDC@etr-usa.com> <20141111101821.GO2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20141111T112847-576@post.gmane.org> <20141111111437.GB28012@calimero.vinschen.de> <20141126205658.GA9157@calimero.vinschen.de> <20141126211251.GB9157@calimero.vinschen.de> <87bnntvegb.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bnntvegb.fsf@Gertrud.fritz.box>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 26 22:28, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > Ok, so we have a cygwin schema extension now.  The file is called
> > cygwin.ldif and is in the Cygwin CVS repo.  It gets installed to
> > /usr/share/cygwin.  The schema extension consists of two auxiliary
> > classes:
> [=E2=80=A6]
> > Do you think this makes sense?  Would you actually use these AD
> > extensions, or do you see your admins using them if available?
>=20
> This is _very_ interesting and I hope to have some discussion with our
> AD admins about this.  It will be some time though, there is just too
> many other things going on right now.  But if they allow this to be
> used, I think it would indeed be possible to get rid of all local
> configuration for a new install on a client machine.

It would be possible for sure.  The question is, would it be actually
used?  In some environments, schema and configuration extensions are
avoided like the plague.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=VXUf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg--