DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=dsXw4FsAiK0BhF6R1HHCk7VMX8txmZo8E36paCs3LVCodKB3IGmeQ
	/V3xq/q2cwWskBi0bT8neUwlwCUmIn0HwrE2r7vMjldwYFl8s80DqfG17FBbgm5r
	x8l+CDE6sQ382Pecjyu9k1dwls5Rb5uwBQ45ZKWaBw+8FdYxmXUlC8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:09:05 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: /usr/local, /var and */tmp in c:\Users\Public
Message-ID: <20141113220905.GW2782@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <81578012-FD3F-4463-BC56-ADB092317DD4@etr-usa.com> <CABa6CEkRV=3FY6ZVGrdt--rH3PppwCJRD5poU0L2knv2k2ce_w@mail.gmail.com> <25F385A9-3E2D-44FC-998F-D2672F67DFE4@etr-usa.com> <m40npq$vrq$1@ger.gmane.org> <ECD073FF-B78C-4D19-8DE1-5F4E390D2495@etr-usa.com> <20141113093335.GI2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <40005E53-A327-4E4A-8C71-514E505F9FBC@etr-usa.com> <20141113213005.GV2782@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9rkt7tfZQigMla7f"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141113213005.GV2782@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--9rkt7tfZQigMla7f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 13 22:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 13 14:09, Warren Young wrote:
> > On Nov 13, 2014, at 2:33 AM, Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.co=
m> wrote:
> >=20
> > > On Nov 12 17:19, Warren Young wrote:
> > >>=20
> > >> I=E2=80=99m not advocating that step so early, but maybe if this bre=
akup does
> > >> happen, a few years later setup.exe can start applying some strong
> > >> ACLs to files it writes.
> > >=20
> > > ??? What "strong" ACLs?
> >=20
> > The ones that are not there right now. :)
> >=20
> > Just to pick a random example:
> >=20
> > $ ls -l /bin/ls.exe
> > -rwxrwxr-x 1 Warren None 116253 Oct 13 10:12 /bin/ls.exe
> >=20
> > The same file=E2=80=99s permissions, from Windows=E2=80=99 perspective:
> >=20
> > http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/ls-perms.png
>=20
> icacls output would be more helpful than a picture.
>=20
> However, this isn't really a problem.  The group permissions are
> apparently faked by Cygwin, they don't reflect the reality.  I just
> don't remember why this is done, it's probably old.  Have to check...

Btw., I never saw this happen.  Did you install for "just you", or
in a non-elevated Setup?  In my case the permissions make at least
sense, even if my own account still has full access:

  $ ls -l /bin/ls.exe
  -rwxr-xr-x 1 corinna vinschen 116253 Oct 13 18:12 /bin/ls.exe


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--9rkt7tfZQigMla7f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=oDep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9rkt7tfZQigMla7f--