X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=MDMmCa2yrU6myE7V
	uF5UYDbo2aUU40bdAz3gdFlvyXdVcHdyEgVf1oGIA6jgpptA8qGcHx3YB2IJg069
	dsGs5U6H9RbL/t8qpaQxia9hfMA3b//CrKN2Z/f2/qzksR47moMDEF8kWbH1gstA
	CQV0E/+gHhfLHYwdDkhee0gD2FU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=qQyqJj49TCBHJDIEvAdMDQ
	boLxI=; b=DVMWGhjZHbmWkMQ75//VpTzJfI+nNCHQe/0Lr6T/56fkqtBT5JEJkZ
	U0lf9MJUmbteL5pSSwKodr+FgGVrBC4Hi0ux3HHmqNAGLmiMiOXC7ssVRbS8V8pE
	21HJAq4LPeCGPL/3TI9pHSOvH9pmnx1FAIGYVvA7E7u2qB39/BhA4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:04:59 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon@yandex.ru>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <671922837.20141114010459@yandex.ru>
To: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin@cygwin.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: RFC: 1.7.33 problem with user's home directory
In-Reply-To: <20141113092702.GH2782@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <20141110205216.GJ2782@calimero.vinschen.de>   <0B8D23F7-0258-472D-BF38-860402FD3CDC@etr-usa.com>  <20141111101821.GO2782@calimero.vinschen.de>  <6FA5AF0B-E176-49DA-A679-A2F9272412D0@etr-usa.com>  <20141113092702.GH2782@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id sADM5OvW022926

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!

>> > 1. Utilize the homeDirectory AD attribute (aka %HOMEDRIVE%%HOMEPATH%).
>> > 2. If homeDirectory is empty, fall back to /home/$USER.
>> 
>> This is just a subset of what I suggested, so I’m in favor of it.
>> (By subset I mean that I’d prefer you do essentially the same thing for the non-AD case, too.)

> This would be most easily implemented as well.

> The beauty here is that probably 99% of the home users don't set
> HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH in their SAM.

They are always set by default.

> So they get /home/$USER as fallback,

No.

> which is what they got with /etc/passwd as well.  And SAM users have the
> XML-like description field entry as well.

> For AD environments HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH are typically set, though.

HOMEDRIVE/HOMEPATH always set.

> Here the users get what they have to use as homedir anyway.

> It's simple, but it should work OOTB for most people.

Yes, it'll work. Just not as you expect it.

>> > 1. Always use /home/$USER and let the admins come up with a matching
>> >   mount point scheme.
>> 
>> That’s neglecting your responsibility as BDFL to set a sensible

> Heh.  I didn't see myself as BDFL yet.  Not sure if that's an honor.

That's a chore. But someone has to pull it.

>> default.  The consequence is that everyone will do it differently, and
>> then you’ll have to support everything on an equal basis, because you
>> chose not to endorse anything.
>> 
>> When you choose a sensible default, you get the option to criticize
>> and even deprecate wild alternative schemes.

> This is a philosophical argument.  You'd have to argue in how far
> always using /home/$USER is NOT a sensible default.

I can give you a whole list of reason, including quotes from Cygwin
documentation, why this is not a good idea.
And "cygwin is not an operating system" will be a red canvas through them.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 14.11.2014, <00:49>

Sorry for my terrible english...

