DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=ZdbsDAuzgDwdDwJvWw0hci6grMAiJScusWWnzGAHVi5G7kKTyHhp3
	73InvjirohQrai8NpF+qejMMXPpmQka7X9u6VEh8hvLmMaTF2r0gW+tvXi19alch
	ltBdZLiwyAsAh0mxRZbw5e6MaRzvGN4AlZSvb6OnLpnWyNDrv8W66M=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:55:51 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Setup 2.774 texlive postinstall takes 10+ hours
Message-ID: <20141113085551.GD2782@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <54618F4C.6000107@cygwin.com> <546191B0.4050808@cygwin.com> <20141111115343.GQ2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <546219A9.2070103@cornell.edu> <54622517.7030302@cornell.edu> <20141111160239.GS2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <87ppctu0ks.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <54629DBF.60303@cornell.edu> <20141112091536.GX2782@calimero.vinschen.de> <87lhng8fwc.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="POjlveFHrWq2ZO+N"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lhng8fwc.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--POjlveFHrWq2ZO+N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 12 18:53, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> >> >Incremental autorebase packages and patched setup.exe available on
> >> >request.
> >>=20
> >> I'd like to see them.  Thanks.
>=20
> I'll upload them on the weekend latest, I'm a bit swamped at work.  I'll
> follow up on this in cygwin-applications.
>=20
> > Yes, me too.
> >
> > Achim, does your perpetual autorebase rely on the existing autorebase
> > script?  If so, do you see a good chance to consolidate the changes
> > into a single package we're still calling _autorebase?
>=20
> No,

No?

> I've replaced it with an incremental autorebase which can function
> as a normal autorebase as well.  I've discussed bits of it on the list
> ~2 years ago, but at that time there was no further interest in having
> something run on every installation.
>=20
> Ah, here it is:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin.applications/23733
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin.applications/23772

=46rom what I read here your _incautorebase would replace _autorebase
just fine.  I'm not concerned about an exact replacement for the
rebaseall script.  The idea would be to make _incautorebase into
drop-in replacement for _autorebase and throw away my _autorebase
stuff.  Rebaseall would stay, it's part of the rebase package anyway.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--POjlveFHrWq2ZO+N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=QJez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--POjlveFHrWq2ZO+N--