DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=XGxvUZY09IC4A+3TwehutDy7yy2zwDHX0K3AugelCz4
	nz5GlcSBbH8Qr2ic+s91YlJvtrh4Eqjo/W3JoymaGVXE+8Jrb6JRPFm8LJeKuEqh
	Y6nB/A+CwgTo5XeA/gibqf4L9PD3WRE9GSAPD4vZUN/MmO3Cf8m9XtqmyQMUbtUc
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <5457FDAF.9050408@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:11:59 -0600
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gcc packaging bug?
References: <5457F7C2.9090204@cornell.edu> <5457FC00.5080907@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5457FC00.5080907@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2014-11-03 16:04, JonY wrote:
> On 11/4/2014 05:46, Ken Brown wrote:
>> The setup.hint files for gcc and its subpackages now say
>>
>> curr: 4.8.3-2
>> prev: 4.8.3-3
>> test: 4.9.2-1
>>
>> I assume this is a typo; it causes everyone who is not installing the
>> test release to get downgraded from 4.8.3-3 to 4.8.3-2.
>
> No, this is deliberate, 4.8.3-3 is bugged, it could not build later
> versions of gcc.

How so?

--
Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple