DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=BgPBbhUTS4OEwKWb/vtRj8nnXjeMCQPLJU/yb8Wdp+n
	MXhaWNvQ6YNCPVck37rcNzTGD07sxwbOAhtOiKbazeIOwramZxS8iS8pu63ktXkV
	ytTdwIRxam7xKxbTrjgcC4NcY75rrZxO+DWVoheTL8/MOFXKNplj6j5ihHvj+r8k
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <54564B57.2050907@cornell.edu>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 10:18:47 -0500
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: texinfo-5.2-3
References: <545631DD.6060708@alice.it>
In-Reply-To: <545631DD.6060708@alice.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/2/2014 8:30 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Ken Brown wrote:
>> ...but the command 'makeinfo --pdf' won't work unless you install texinfo-tex
>
> Before the splitting I had installed the texinfo package and it did not require
> any TeXLive packages.

That was because I had decided not to require texlive, since so much of the 
functionality of texinfo was usable without it.  But it was still the case with 
the old packaging that 'makeinfo --pdf' wouldn't work without a TeX installation.

> Now If I try to install also texinfo-tex package, setup wants to install also
> texlive packages which I don't need.

The whole point of texinfo-tex is that it contains those programs from the old 
texinfo package that are useless without TeX.  So naturally texinfo-tex requires 
texlive.

> Indeed I already have TexLive installed as
> monolithic distribution from TeXLive site.

That's a completely different issue, not really related to texinfo.  If there 
are Cygwin packages that require TeX in order to function, I think maintainers 
have to make them depend on texlive.  Users who choose to install TeX from 
another source will find this annoying, but I don't see what I can do about 
that.  Some Linux distros have mechanisms for dealing with this situation; I 
don't remember the details, but somehow it's possible to declare that you have 
installed something equivalent to a given package.  But Cygwin's setup doesn't 
provide this feature.

> It looks as if we have exchanged Perl with TeXLive...

Not really.  The issue with Perl was that it was included in a *default* Cygwin 
installation.

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple