DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=eh04As6BQsYvtdV7A/9Z2o5ZYZgdrUakW4LaIDXaiLv
	dbOsOjYpvlmYCgN99YbaLQt1zyYqeNVSD+0Sy/iF+BSwq71+zbKoZ44m3zdxdjx6
	8rgfUjZGNig1XqulAuHTqoJHkOYSORHSHRxQkG3Rd6SiAH5iTBUZbmwUJB7ErcrQ
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <541C428F.3020301@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:49:51 +0200
From: Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Packages up for adoption
References: <CAGHJv4dmKs=USE51uj3vL8dDDsFNV7cUzHLuFQKKNVzg6SerBQ@mail.gmail.com> <541C3E53.80508@etr-usa.com>
In-Reply-To: <541C3E53.80508@etr-usa.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 19/09/2014 16:31, Warren Young wrote:
> On 9/18/2014 11:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking for any volunteers to take over
>> maintainership of the following packages: ... hexedit
>
> I could do hexedit.
>
> I downloaded the source package, and was happy to see that you'd
> cygported it already.  It looks to be pretty rarely updated, which is
> nice from a maintainership standpoint.
>
> I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. There doesn't seem to be a mailing list for the project at its home,
> which is now http://rigaux.org/  (The cygport file gives an older URL.)
>   How do you learn about new releases?

I suspect the updated rate is very very low for this time of sources.
(similar to bvi that is taking 10 years from 1.3.2 to 1.4.0 release 
candidate)

> 2. I built it from the cygport, and the result seems to work, except
> that the function keys aren't being interpreted correctly.  Is this a
> problem in MinTTY, in the terminal protocol I've selected (xterm-color),
> or in hexedit?  If the latter, I think I'm signing up to release a -2 to
> fix it.
>
> 3. Is there a good reason for this to remain in the distro along with
> bvi, other than "it's not vi"?

that the last upstream version is already packed, so you can also do 
nothing for the time being ?

  ;-)
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple