DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=dLWTNkYjqfDMkNf+gz55CUiuRQBGpH6H5OddCXXdviWhCbdHeYZkl
	wX8sKETE5ePV/UNnFzFQiKLuOtBex1kHptWfqHYy8hKLIbPy0OGXA8Y0UyET9AHW
	m9/dcqBvk3oDr8cUWMFKZ4jGnDNpMGo52B7Ob6LhIR6Iu6n/+GC4iI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:19:14 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: (call-process ...) hangs in emacs
Message-ID: <20140902191914.GG6056@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <loom.20140827T170804-533@post.gmane.org> <loom.20140828T085927-71@post.gmane.org> <20140828095524.GO20700@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140828131832.GT20700@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20140828T172529-396@post.gmane.org> <loom.20140829T115632-276@post.gmane.org> <20140901115701.GD2644@calimero.vinschen.de> <87ppffs0kw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <20140902083217.GM2644@calimero.vinschen.de> <87mwaiq6bt.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87mwaiq6bt.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sep  2 19:29, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> >> Installed, everything looks fine so far.
> >
> > Thanks for testing!  Maybe you'd like to have a view into the simple
> > as well as the more complex ACLs created by Cygwin?  Icacls output
> > is moderately easy to read.  If you have questions or concerns...
>=20
> I've used icacls in the past.  Is there anything that you want me to
> check specifically?

More or less, just compare the ACLs and see if you find strange
differences.  This only works for the ACLs created or modified with
`setfacl' and the snapshot DLL.  The ACLs created or modified via
setfacl with the older DLLs always were different and, I have to admit,
kind of broke the default POSIX permissions created via open() or
chmod().  The idea of my change was to make them always in an identical
fashion.  The order may only vary in secondary permissions, but never
in the standard permissions, which also always come first.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=LKka
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zGQnqpIoxlsbsOfg--