DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Yd568k4oxPqHYg5v
	rzlDPF/Eux03Y9k/OuXGPcD1izK6EiHpz2A5Nh+cJwtxOq8WcRzewTqCySnTEsPG
	PxnuBRDIOFan/mbPjWIq6e8NkrwgLtWECyqPPYssmFncQ2+v9QQavsHyFdKG5jXd
	2bzOiC/IyZa7lMHmYpiaHbHjUfk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 23:45:07 +0400
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon@yandex.ru>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <1815776339.20140828234507@yandex.ru>
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: (call-process ...) hangs in emacs
In-Reply-To: <87bnr4las4.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
References: <53E3F2AE.7030608@redhat.com> <53E4D01B.9010005@cornell.edu> <53F1F154.1020702@cornell.edu> <53FB87DC.2050908@cornell.edu> <87wq9v9j2y.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <53FD0662.5050208@cornell.edu> <20140827084245.GD20700@calimero.vinschen.de> <17910052714.20140828010203@yandex.ru> <20140828100112.GQ20700@calimero.vinschen.de> <187704841.20140828172337@yandex.ru> <20140828141036.GW20700@calimero.vinschen.de> <87bnr4las4.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Greetings, Achim Gratz!

>> Here's the prerequisite:
>>
>>   Would more than one person want that *and* be willing to give this a
>>   *thorough* testing?

> That really becomes an issue only if you have to use external shares
> that are set up in peculiar ways and AD integration.

I've managed to do that on a local machine that is not a member of any domain.
Using noacl mount flag ever since, to avoid similar things from happening.

> The number of people that fall into that category is… small, let's say.
> For the ACL
> part it would be possible to set up a test bed on a local machine, but
> my guess for the number of people doing that just for the fun of testing
> is that it's likely to be an even smaller number.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 28.08.2014, <23:40>

Sorry for my terrible english...