X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=hVTqaE
	pWH9i3shxBL6nzfHUwYwIVfBnTF9WujlwPEq5VoVZ7Ge1RX1cuNFzFKrhi75XqVO
	BejEDpu1iTSeAAw1o8gn27RQdpin0wFNg1qnb9ylVPE3gHmykMWVWHOfQbsoZIwB
	D9l93ddQHhv7SSUAozTcQUraC1jfaaMmfURxU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=f25LqgCNBQn+
	UdbtzhD/0rEJn7s=; b=YACtRVjUU2AyT2jWhNlaohH0JyPXFYBj2CWJeuq6jX2n
	9Oy/EaXwdr8JUQl0py04FFhFMY7gLXFAF6rrcQbAiaG1xbJ56wq3GUKnJItfP+/D
	t8kFNG2Cea/OWYX1nIvPq33Y9nuCv3aKCzCZTzwFmHIYq4HCPs0U2T0j10xnTKY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID: <53D934F4.3020408@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:09:56 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration?
References: <20140730134716.GM25860@calimero.vinschen.de> <53D90F4B.6060002@abacus.ch>
In-Reply-To: <53D90F4B.6060002@abacus.ch>
OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ANBsU20TkBvCvI6RQnjk0WEctm4aH6Frc"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--ANBsU20TkBvCvI6RQnjk0WEctm4aH6Frc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[resent; no idea why gpg tried to encrypt my first attempt]

On 07/30/2014 09:29 AM, Wolf Geldmacher wrote:

>=20
> Is there anything preventing you from using the pathname conventions for
> user names?

Yes, we already discussed and dismissed that as too painful.
Tilde-expansion in the shell would be broken (you can't get
~domain/user/file to expand into /path/to/users_home/file, because the
shell tries to treat it as /path/to/domains_home/user/file).

Colon is equally bad, since 'chown domain:user:domain:group' is unparseable.

'chown domain+user:domain+group' is at least reasonable.

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org



--ANBsU20TkBvCvI6RQnjk0WEctm4aH6Frc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJT2TT0AAoJEKeha0olJ0NqJkIH/24w275yXZ6gyTRMXOtIfFWY
x78F+no+25fLyLp6auwCv8fu9OAAivx26kSymNOq17RRvkPWwpaEIjMlwhit8ykQ
e2xLi/3wizoSXV9igHDkNh5032uI9kmzsOUp3AwH6ULtZKJGHaHGLMlC1NlWjPAA
N4xDQo0zHX3nlFN09CijjjMI0Ue0ISh0812QFu7pUPVC7+PQ1Zh2o7etyEMevSUp
jCP8ffUhgEOH+AErEQyzMc1uNb/nQ3kPBoxawwzDYSFre5I0RituyoYA1J60NuW9
p6mdefqs8o6AH88Yu3L+P+Gok3dmDpe5S+2VcZnJi/GrD8JyRWQ7g/r0RQ0RaT4=
=ZeDr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ANBsU20TkBvCvI6RQnjk0WEctm4aH6Frc--
