DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=Rf9kJRmuyCZzoDzrTjQP1lU+O91kCiCk3
	JJbqt7AvNMObShU/1VQU1XYvAcD6NCdsqpgH2HGdUhslxNF0I4DWPC4bdW1NzAPT
	S7MYc2SajCzKDopkmrlghX7sbES5hk+CxHNqlDhpgmn4xNWnQejHdFyiw2eLEX6j
	2CnhaDm5EE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <53BD7161.5030209@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 09:44:17 -0700
From: David Rothenberger <daveroth@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Severe performance degradation of writev
References: <lpciht$pc5$1@ger.gmane.org> <20140707101049.GI1803@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140707134137.GK1803@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140707134137.GK1803@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul  7 12:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul  7 07:28, jojelino wrote:
>>> 2008-07-27  Corinna Vinschen  <corinna@vinschen.de>
>>> 
>>> * fhandler_socket.cc (fhandler_socket::send_internal): Send
>>> never more then 64K bytes at once.  For blocking sockets, loop
>>> until entire data has been sent or an error occurs. 
>>> (fhandler_socket::sendto): Drop code which sends on 64K bytes. 
>>> (fhandler_socket::sendmsg): Ditto.
>>> 
>>> This commit added workaround for KB823764. but it has brought
>>> another performance issue when writev sends <64k of data.
>> 
>> That's why the code contains that FIXME comment.  If you have a
>> good idea for simple code to split a message into the least
>> number of pieces to minimize the number of WsaSendTo calls...
> 
> I took a stab at the code and I think the new version improves
> writing multiple small buffers a lot.  In my testing it still works
> in other scenarios, too, but I would be very grateful if somebody
> could have a critical look into my code changes as posted in 
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2014-q3/msg00003.html
> 
> I uploaded a new developer snapshot to
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Please give it a thorough try.

FWIW, this snapshot fixed a recent performance degradation for me when
doing ssh/rsync transfers within my local network at work. These
transfers had run at about 25 MB/s but recently degraded to about 500
kB/s. The snapshot restored the original performance.


-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth@acm.org

Issawi's Laws of Progress:
        The Course of Progress:
                Most things get steadily worse.
        The Path of Progress:
                A shortcut is the longest distance between two points.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple