DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=wF
	gRp6gcz0DuiXYvYIk8LuwykYsIatGEabjlCBGIdvy/MBHTDvDdnAbSg6oUCBZKlp
	Stn2dTGuP0sNq1D01DXSs6r6BAZxa9v6oWtg3R+z/LqLUFGvkPj9bVSyYu8eUc3l
	6CedsRXXn5eiBHX23xBhVYaYs5PYP1FjsGZdxz3sU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <53A4A299.6090508@etr-usa.com>
References: <53A4A299.6090508@etr-usa.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPYQg336Z73grz41MQp2QAcXAR9yfhHHj9Ci55RpiEFKiGtjYw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Too many mailing lists
From: KIMURA Masaru <hiyuh.root@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

> The Cygwin project has too many mailing lists.

+1

> I see real value in only 3 lists:
>
>   1. User discussions
>   2. Development of Cygwin-the-project (broader than the DLL)
>   3. Talk

-1
just unify only 1 ML is simple.
the cygwin ML flow looks not so massive.
we know using well composed subject can split them in local box.
filtering announcement and other unintended info at local is also easy.
splitting non-massive flow to many MLs looks totally meaningless.
it only help bluffing "our project is big."

just my 2 cents.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple