X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=AKyBR2nEX3Nndrb7
	JqM5Lcyu0vfsm177nMPHUU4+a0x52pK/S2BoOIwUIh9fGPnotfj6PitVyiPDujFz
	pRIE5xdicMYq9tLcwhtwfyR1cW+gos6Ppvs8i4XEVIpsiaigcFJPzn6mFwHJ+I9+
	gzzJ5x0+ZuLunl7+GavU6+i1dNY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ikePU4iT5IvUXcwV0shww6
	w76Pc=; b=W35NbxheZsLlPBO49CUkPmbdNY7ZgFjLWB9yZ64wHEQBobqx8Bz/Bu
	aijBUcZUBgf5DeAkJJjTngLbi46602geRKfjPyQXsZQoNT9UsBfhjjQsVa7QYx9v
	C0jv+yu+8n4+e0Urwx1pNgpVZslxV8w70xWaRzF3N7RWndMNdyASQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:34:58 +0400
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon@yandex.ru>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <297930945.20140618133458@yandex.ru>
To: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Website: Package listing not working + cygport query
In-Reply-To: <53A11DDD.6050102@cygwin.com>
References: <5395FA98.5050005@tiscali.co.uk> <20140617143111.GF7138@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140617153200.GA6910@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <53A11DDD.6050102@cygwin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, Yaakov Selkowitz!

>> Yaakov, wouldn't it make sense not to just use 0/0 as user/group when
>> generating packages with cygport by forcing --owner=0, --group=0 to the
>> tar command?  I'm not suggesting that this is the right way to fix this
>> particular problem but I don't think it's a good idea to leak people's
>> names and groups out onto the interwebs if we can help it.  It will also
>> make the packages slightly smaller.

> That would undermine any legitimate specification of gid/uid.  I would 
> like to see how this is handled in the Linux distros first.

IMO, if you DO need to have specific ownership on specific files, you ought to
use postinstall scripts to amend the situation to your expectations.

P.S.
The packages I personally know use 'install' to place specific files with
specific uid/gid/access bits.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon@yandex.ru) 18.06.2014, <13:30>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

