DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=npej9mFDQG5DZj9QFEpfTx4qIVwGgfqWVYPrmdYIYA0
	xOVwi+gzlcc8Pp3WqHtbwfO5PCDeNS+KdPg8Rn9PBRENfbnQcNkFZdVK5yvNoDye
	ApinJuI4BtCP0IW2mz4MA8qEOQzGtKsl93tMbm8ReT61BgyuhdyRo3Z9MTh3m+H0
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <53924A57.6060401@cygwin.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 18:10:15 -0500
From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz@cygwin.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [SECURITY] Updated: openssl-1.0.1h-1, libopenssl098-0.9.8za-1
References: <announce.539177E6.10903@cygwin.com> <58o3p99uet4ovpjrokurvhr41iebne9tuf@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <58o3p99uet4ovpjrokurvhr41iebne9tuf@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2014-06-06 10:42, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> I don't see any reason here that programs that depend on libopenssl100,
> such as stunnel, would need to be rebuit for this update.  Do you?

No, but it would be nice if maintainers would rebuild their programs 
still dependent on libopenssl098 (on x86).


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple