X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=mMxv3obXUd9AVhKj
	b0C8HKZvTj2f0uiDDCZqAHA+87AIJWQTfReEsexaonniH8vkAUZVAgI3tIN4ITcn
	Wjvk2Go8g5VEg1vyFMVvXlVfZwPMy6qp9/KWEnFQzFP1AqWCcM+S39cxINGyIR1t
	KWcYUqZaSoMDF7RrlEvzltBLexw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=dFql6fTtjoEJOvf/wL1WMG
	OjwzE=; b=CqXJB9BKpOoic+E8Fx5igTe3nQ3akAQ9hBc6BvkN7v567i2lPwCDis
	vOjuvpVk/otbX9NB0tV+gNyHhs9gwZi0ZV64Tt0Rt7Zy0Z6aM9n5tvj+ARbMxsVh
	54dJ8b8wV4AU1hLr0PSylYXnbY3Y9DeAYFkEOjz4EA0+ljvW8gVe0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: plane.gmane.org
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: jdavidboyd@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd)
Subject: Re: "cygpath -u" inside backticks differs
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:31:43 -0400
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <e0tcegz4agq8.fsf@www1.g9.pair.com>
References: <20140604012839.GA17012@praz2.hsd1.ma.comcast.net>	<538E7D3C.5020501@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:

>
> see why `` is obsolete, and you should be using $()?  Among other
> reasons, \ inside `` has weird rules.
>

Wow, when did this happen?  I've been using `` for years, and never heard of
$().  What version did this change?

I think I need to go back and re-read some documentation!

Dave


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple