X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=DufuN4/SEacjuwpDCFE1K7r7XfiSpjSCMSjaY11SMNG
	5ABGC0kT9We+u0tz6LYMe0nhqF6KB3As8SYE2BBF5Bj+4UserA+HkFBTFtoSLFta
	W7M/GjC6d2AveNRRLuhmd9o1ngqxgjcCw/XViHaeAKlkuMbepUWlndPQ2OMTrXW4
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=/VooUpjVdLW3wKMmR/K+ljFi/5o=; b=RpRWK0gJ4JJ99vmHy
	LYWSi55mffohfmJQHkqLh/uRPQ+1nnLuJhREknIlBZMe4fodF+r+8YRHWRLvN5Cc
	21QLXR2tYoGS9pPuHyghT1ULYf49MfnCnTKSPrq/e6cXX7jzgpfWTthLOTV6FjoG
	ayIY05SJ3thdTLGayhFUBxh8Es=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wg0-f48.google.com
X-Received: by 10.180.92.34 with SMTP id cj2mr47127wib.15.1399583647156;        Thu, 08 May 2014 14:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <536BF39C.7010703@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:14:04 +0200
From: jdzstz <jdzstz@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Bug at getsockopt when TCP_NODELAY is used as parameter
References: <CA+wAnvyrB2ecwdJsvzqmMNjPFTnW6rT0rYdNcXRbK4z5WJqwyg@mail.gmail.com> <535CC856.7050808@gmail.com> <20140505123459.GJ30918@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140505152821.GA7694@calimero.vinschen.de> <536965D8.3080503@gmail.com> <20140507075103.GD30918@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20140507075103.GD30918@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Hi,

Thank you about the information.

Regards,
Jorge Díaz

El 07/05/2014 9:51, Corinna Vinschen escribió:
> On May  7 00:44, jdzstz wrote:
>> Hi Corinna,
>>
>> I have recompiled and tested Varnish Cache 3.0.5 against cygwin
>> snapshot 2014-05-05 (64 bits), removing my workaround, and now
>> TCP_NODELAY functionality works fine.
>>
>> In order to planning the release of fixed varnish 3.0.5, Do you have
>> any estimated release date for future Cygwin 1.7.30?
> Not yet, no.  The new SAM/AD code(1) needs a bit more testing and at
> least one more change(2) and, worst of all, I still have to change the
> User's Guide and FAQ to reflect this big change.
>
>
> Corinna
>
> (1) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/txtClll38W8u9.txt
> (2) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00098.html
>


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

