DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=Cc0DlIcIPGY0pILDBGJi1e/MAcS5cipJGMUhbgyzANm
	KDyYqRSnEXpm7iS+MTZDxjFvdrA61Lzg9itcICKDPZRDzJ4aqP84mfbdLv5SV9UU
	UIFYlpy/6SZfVmUiT/os9DyYkbW0pIZCJe8C3Ciaflx5WgYjTLfKfztpDdQZoPLI
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <53644FCE.4010206@cornell.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 22:09:18 -0400
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Fatal error from Cygwin emacs-w32 every day or so
References: <B8D164BED956C5439875951895CB4B2225C00EA9@WABOTH9MSGUSR8C.ITServices.sbc.com>	<534B2EFE.4010509@cornell.edu>	<B8D164BED956C5439875951895CB4B2225C01C84@WABOTH9MSGUSR8C.ITServices.sbc.com>	<534CB0AF.2040504@cornell.edu> <83y4z7jcb3.fsf@gnu.org>	<534D5AB8.6030201@cornell.edu> <535308D8.1070200@cornell.edu>	<87fvksekqn.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87wqe4cv4x.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
In-Reply-To: <87wqe4cv4x.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 5/2/2014 6:50 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> Sorry for the long delay.  I've now ran the two Emacs versions side by
>> side for two days.  The original has crashed twice during that time and
>> the patched version is still running… so I'd call that a fix.  Thanks!
>
> Just as I had sent this mail, the new Emacs also crashed.  The backtrace
> is likely useless due to the missing symbols (I have it still running in
> gdb, though), but it appears to be one of the timer-triggered crashes
> (these sometimes only produce a lisp error and sometimes crash Emacs and
> I don't think these have anything to do with gnutls).  I guess switching
> to the 24.4 pre-release is more productive than continuing with trying
> to patch the 24.3 version.

I agree.  I'll do that soon.

Ken


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple