DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=GCDbPnefzm99uG9l8TouAnvC8Qij1pA04QouzPlXq3CJnB69tgfau
	dZdUuWcgU/3+YQ7+IqB2RqI668zSW66BFKzBJ4W4ZFP+jYbgMhqxnbR5toqCLFGR
	ChHobj7+EDPJBvmeqJjkS04uo5uDJxGxJTg5TNMBWT5dsikfygcCA4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:46:24 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: We need steenking patches (Re: Cygwin kill utility...)
Message-ID: <20140412144624.GE3271@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAAXzdLUk3L3zRcGoLmb=GM-rnF7K8Y=fqNA8n9gfgVhja5TL2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20140409055117.GA1878@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <CAAXzdLXxAnB0JYHuvJj44ZAT=Uc-G12Xt+xsirnmiPBkOJ4U-w@mail.gmail.com> <53457A4C.1050104@etr-usa.com> <20140409170517.GA6319@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <53472600.7050008@lysator.liu.se> <20140411021742.GA6242@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <53479351.4050703@lysator.liu.se> <20140411121042.GB23281@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140411170931.GA7818@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="19uQFt6ulqmgNgg1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140411170931.GA7818@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--19uQFt6ulqmgNgg1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 11 13:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:10:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 11 09:01, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>The newlib license is liberal enough for RedHat to relicense it under
> >>their own terms?
> >
> >That's it, more or less.
>=20
> I have never seen how you can have it both ways, legally speaking.  I
> was told not to worry about it when I was at Red Hat but no one ever
> gave me a convincing explanation.  Since there are no assignments in
> newlib land, it just relies on BSD-like licensing.  I don't see why
> Cygwin can't do the same.

BTAT in 2011.  IANAL, but the reason is the buyout clause which,
apparently, requires a certain amount of red tape while, incidentally,
funds a non-trivial amount of the time I can spend on Cygwin.

I'm just curious why you never asked the question while you were still
working at Red Hat.  Anyway, I asked again.  Times change so procedures
might change as well.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--19uQFt6ulqmgNgg1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=4EBv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--19uQFt6ulqmgNgg1--