X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=DUPghcliQ9CYrjzQ
	i0ju2q8NgReaTnvyTNzS/72wVH5fLP54kBeNvAKoTRKKlJbPeeBk2WXzqvms9aIk
	FVmTEhnJFRzujRrtaE8jti6Fpny0BNlYu6wqcPZv07DsfcnNoO8XqcEfYvzZ8WQw
	v1Oe4hxqVKKS3+pn82xXp2S3nio=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=hNPW+bOWwACVDMBMXImCm1
	HOi0Q=; b=Xdw7Y7di2r1+hYGqBDhSJQfcPAD179SYs6c6g6k4F8F8mKSLxUsrZy
	Zz7qgAwQCba23hSao+rPlokV38/u4FudeNbTFmUS81t9hIA9BTcF0PvulMNEY7Vs
	iCAkTSElI3OJ8EC7t4XBMkCDe/XSZ++GQ0YNihvqY28YgvVXEg6Kk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173023pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <5346FD2B.8060201@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:20:59 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Still testing needed: New passwd/group AD/SAM integration
References: <20140410145323.GB2437@calimero.vinschen.de> <5346B667.3040704@breisch.org> <20140410152809.GD2437@calimero.vinschen.de> <5346E55D.6020405@etr-usa.com> <20140410190424.GK2437@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-reply-to: <20140410190424.GK2437@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 4/10/2014 3:04 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I like slashes a lot more for obvious reasons.  But maybe, and that
> wouldn't be too hard to implement, we could accept account names with
> slash and with backslash, just as we do with pathnames.  Output of
> usernames would be with slashes, of course.
>
> Well, just an idea.


Yeah but I'd say it's a good one if it it can be done without too much
trouble.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

