DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=LA6tJl9peZatna3ng44y/W6lx/Kst
	EZ/P7xjjD+tAz95DR3wanhks9vSWHiO8d/oZzdh+rg64eqKm7in2Ib4aPxtm40pa
	TzuRuZwCzKUJGf6qmNbTTfTS87uCbYD21fzFVpPyMxTj0nN56P1ppBs85f0mKiAt
	QCKRaVjNkwKitI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:20:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHfZ7XrvFvJT=8B6s9DVoNBNjhrmfSB6LuKfsm5otwOvTTuF1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Mercurial 2.8 or 2.9?
From: Ti Strga <wearyofallthiscrap@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Upstream Mercurial is at 2.9.2, but looking in
http://cygwin.com/packages/x86/mercurial/ there's only 2.5.x
and 2.7.x.

Are there plans to package a more recent release?  Or alternatively,
is there anything in particular holding them back?  The only recent
hits for mercurial that mnogosearch could find in the archives for the
main cygwin and cygwin-apps lists were mentions in people's
cygcheck output, but I don't know what's been discussed in other
lists or IRC or etc.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple