DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=QT6IBa8/d6+IrdR6K5RcAljpaPP0ETNg0vsrIFvhAY8h07NUXqa4R
	odU3qBUu0YgktcVkOwGHMX3waZK6FTzyrGNcVRorWiRh/CYdjcsXNSMHtS0maUi/
	jKt0u3c3Sp0yTMmdbpR50+CjOTGNhAVImEE2ZkBCSe+TWQLoglAaMY=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:04:12 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: File permissions when using ACLs
Message-ID: <20140311130412.GA21306@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAKfFMLQe3L3q_qJ-=07KiCQwraqQYP3jbB-8fohZaH9-7PWnSg@mail.gmail.com> <542902046.20140311163047@yandex.ru> <CAKfFMLR8RUR8x5pWt=+J5os+46Q9JQRMx3syWFJPVXxPj1HU4w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKfFMLR8RUR8x5pWt=+J5os+46Q9JQRMx3syWFJPVXxPj1HU4w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar 11 08:40, Charles Plager wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>=20
> I understand that Cygwin is emulating POSIX permissions (and, yes, we
> already turn this off using the /etc/fstab).  What I don't understand
> is why it uses "special" permissions and not the standard "read/write"
> options that are available.
>=20
> One possibility I just though of: Cygwin uses special permissions in
> the case where the file is not executable (but readable or
> readable/writable)?  I guess I can see that.

That, and the FILE_DELETE_CHILD flag.  But you're just looking into the
simplified output on the security tab.  The "advanced" view is a bit
more helpful, though not exactly.

> I'd still love to hear from anybody who's experienced the vanishing
> permissions...

Never seen that.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=fjcP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--