X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=fTrxm63twIWcLULq
	50CqTh0AaXQXtPKhRosKf6PyATgWdqYxReqdwRNIAS9fF42o+FIW0cHl4nLhMyz2
	EpE2G/bx12mokKgdMykJeSIPCly7CFQUrRdxxND2OO/TGByKvEItc2AzuXZ1MpOF
	Y385EyzgXwTFGAM+MhsSIolVFmI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=OFxmfxO1MJyRfQpuMZ0pTO
	CCEQ8=; b=Nw2bHCIKxkhgn+1iUG4gFo34grJ7a/VFKYatDxHHy8hIDSNH56PgX5
	p8GX2icTCe5XjTE64wopXpSiU/P8nF3mlo6F+RqCJlA+PRyKbHEqTcgPUwKMGmJS
	08fZFZYyhZ83WLnudHClGl0RhM6AkrB2/qyG4Fr0F1mk+wUo7cNy8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173025pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <5310AFE4.5030702@cygwin.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:48:52 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: new setup.exe -  another problem, or is this behavior expected?
References: <lentij$287$1@ger.gmane.org> <530FCBE1.5080405@cygwin.com> <leq8ja$7db$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <leq8ja$7db$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 2/28/2014 10:05 AM, carolus wrote:
> On 2/27/2014 5:36 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> , if you start one session of setup, select a
>> package, download it, and don't install it (for whatever reason), then
>> start another setup session and do the same thing with a with a different
>> mirror, you'll get the same package again under a different directory tree
>> (the root of that tree being loosely named after the mirror you chose).
>
> Does this mean that install-from-internet is a better choice than
> download-without-installing when the connection is apt to be broken? Or for
> combining several overnight runs to cope with a slow connection? Currently
> I'm downloading to an external USB drive which I then use to reinstall
> Cygwin on several machines.
>
> And thanks for the explanation.

Either should work OK, as the former is a superset of the latter.  The key
thing is to not pick more than 1 mirror if you don't need to.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

