DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=XJbm4
	j9Ztrbexw+Q9zDxp4MQ/wdUtynD01Mqm2d7wnPzHNLQ6qGms01H1YgHalbZ/nNT4
	Mih4oTUGbqf0URJ7n2CUTF9c99RhekT8Ud5Dw/ft9YCX0ZgAYE87bnWSlSj/pOV1
	Gp3YJ5Dv6EbTzNyjLsrVlvHlLh3rXrGmkPbxkU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Testers needed:  New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
References: <20140213143849.GH2246@calimero.vinschen.de>	<87fvn7cb68.fsf@Rainer.invalid>	<20140225200414.GA4238@calimero.vinschen.de>	<87y50zaqjb.fsf@Rainer.invalid>	<20140225215423.GA6065@calimero.vinschen.de>	<loom.20140226T085959-119@post.gmane.org>	<20140226100209.GR2246@calimero.vinschen.de>	<20140226135222.GW2246@calimero.vinschen.de>	<loom.20140227T095414-414@post.gmane.org>	<loom.20140227T100638-8@post.gmane.org>	<20140227094951.GD2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:45:56 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20140227094951.GD2246@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's	message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:49:51 +0100")
Message-ID: <8738j3dyvf.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> 1 second?  That sounds still a bit slow.

It appears that that there are multiple DC involved, either via
delegation or redirection (as I've managed to get some partial group
resolutions where groups from a particular domain were absent).  So all
this slowness probably has to do with roundtrip times.  Based on that
hypothesis I've done the same test again via DSL/VPN and got this:

1:49 stock-cvs
1:15 getgroups
0:13 noldap

The times don't change all that much whether I've clogged the DSL
connection or not, so the size of the response doesn't seem to be a
major factor here.

> Still, it seems like the right thing to do to drop the group name
> configuration stuff entirely.

Indeed.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple