DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=RdSH
	N1EWA89u0yZzmIwDDhecNGFvyEJcoxGdc6qCgosnxTdxFZiUgJkkpVCtcmAvAyYN
	+3FlDx240nedJmtDBNCipdjxPvdIQjoXUzVUelBgYXNIgRGA9eER23uUorxqcIX5
	3ZCvUTNWJhrntpcwXofK73wmGeFjaqZXUzBKygs=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:29:46 +0000
From: Adam Dinwoodie <adam@dinwoodie.org>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: getent-2.18.90-1
Message-ID: <20140224142946.GD10290@tastycake.net>
References: <announce.20140220191920.GS2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <announce.20140220191920.GS2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:19:20PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I just uploaded the new getent package to the 32 and 64 bit distros.

Getent is included in Base, but it has a dependency on libargp, which is
only in Devel and Libs.  At least that's the case for the 32-bit
packages; I've not checked 64-bit.  Can/should we lift that dependency,
or add libargp to Base as well?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple