X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=XRjHg5GEOmW5F0O1
	kKsarGI6o6f653vUSJ3I24+j0BBjEUPFBiC982GbrRwzKvieDxjU0I69FMYXSaEW
	XFk0/k9VwdngTbEvCvDJvfSDrbgNUQBQ8t7VO+yd83O4ptgSzipDoIDU8/fnbkFz
	1QyMW5V+6dC4amrEN6g3vU638hI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=x8Q8ikldnOEzs/8xWQH3Bx
	sMiKs=; b=pfgFMi02LX6+Ey0CTgoqL8ATCWR4HfKNbTBoN2NXHa7Xx4XJqswdZi
	9DlUHHRi0bTBFNSxNcWoLFi04HJCizo5vwv6R0Qc2p4Ue5MECoGDTRu6lVZWGYjK
	xrQiMARZcF0vJO6mBj6smsVh8WXZo3gK+XIXlwqIKmRHTUTRpeNAc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173023pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <52E1462F.30505@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:41:19 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: AW: [bulk] - Re: Reduce noise in dependency declaration during uninstall in setup.exe
References: <52DF0B86.5030402@etr-usa.com> <52DF1477.2050707@etr-usa.com> <52DF18B1.5050200@cygwin.com> <20140122060243.GC4286@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <52E03241.6010000@etr-usa.com> <20140123011304.GB2526@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <52E128E7.1090205@etr-usa.com> <52E132CB.6030609@hones.org.uk> <8CCC8F85C5F2784387A32FAD835FB4E60EC1EC706D@server03.company.internal>
In-reply-to: <8CCC8F85C5F2784387A32FAD835FB4E60EC1EC706D@server03.company.internal>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 1/23/2014 10:40 AM, DEWI - N. Zacharias wrote:

<snip>

>
> [...]
>
>> One solution to this would be to reimplement it as two separate parts -
>> a non-Cygwin envelope (which could even be installed as an msi) and a
>> Cygwin-based package maintainer.  The Cygwin-based part would be a
>> completely separate Cygwin installation, with its own cygwin1.dll, and a
>> minimal set of utilities, and would not interfere with the main
>> installation.
>> The non-cygwin wrapper would simply install/update this mini-Cygwin
>> system and invoke the Cygwin-based package maintainer.
>
> I second this idea.
>
>> The package maintainer would be based on the existing setup.exe,
>
> I think this is not that good. If you rewrite the tool you should throw
> away ballast and use the chance to include new helpful things like a clean
> interface to an installation config file which allows cloning of existent
> installations.

Unless there's someone reading this thread that's actually going to jump
in and start working on setup-next-generation, I'd like to ask others that
are considering adding to this thread to not do so.  Talking about what
would be great as a next-generation version of setup has been done plenty
in the past and it's quite likely that a continuation of this thread along
this line will rehash what has already been said.  What's missing isn't
ideas on how to make a better setup facility.  What's missing are the
brave and capable souls to do it.  If this describes you, I'd recommend
checking the archives for previous discussions on this subject and
then proposing a plan based on those discussions.  Best to do that on the
cygwin-apps list though.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple