X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Mem/NO9NNPia28Rx U/L8IlRR47b+1CsrnV4sVxigYmAPjg6E+BR0IUyHMmz9zeNGXUvAUX6KEdnUYQpR rb4biKekicGj+bCK27Dl9ekoRVsgI7lcRkWCy/3IjhPv6jeHOnVrBTAvQlPVfz+D ZYu8kYR+t/Y2Q+nGsCdymWPstZY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=dGUFDYR0ynccdxQoPe7HvT tSO+s=; b=t+N8GSaeOC24heteuM10Burs2Ekhq4a6fix2yDx6fLneyrJjE2yDyl CzQhKp6lvmHk6RPtmXPdiJwtUQc7EBv87W4nS/zIHUqT+exBR3LkV+4X8LzEG4uw CgzwiCP7Z8vpghB02EocrSHJw51P/dYAQGAfNbq+X3MkbAh3HcPTs= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ea0-f182.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.14.198.195 with SMTP id v43mr277417een.62.1390428986310; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:16:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140115105534.GB31912@tastycake.net> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:16:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maintainer for git? From: Balaji Venkataraman To: Cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s0MMGg5c019381 On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Steven Penny wrote: > Are you certain the bug is present in Adam’s version? He has tested it here > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-01/msg00085.html I just tried cloning something big again (the linux kernel). See below. The first one was with git-1.7.9 the default Cygwin version. x86$ git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git linux-git-1.7.9 Cloning into 'linux-git-1.7.9'... remote: Counting objects: 3366700, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (507909/507909), done. remote: Total 3366700 (delta 2833548), reused 3362709 (delta 2829741) Receiving objects: 100% (3366700/3366700), 705.04 MiB | 3.25 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (2833548/2833548), done. x86$ cd / x86$ tar xf ~/git-1.8.5.2-1.tar.xz x86$ cd x86$ git --version git version 1.8.5.2 x86$ git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git linux-git-1.8.5.2 Cloning into 'linux-git-1.8.5.2'... remote: Counting objects: 3366700, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (508113/508113), done. remote: Total 3366700 (delta 2833563), reused 3362434 (delta 2829537) Receiving objects: 100% (3366700/3366700), 703.64 MiB | 2.16 MiB/s, done. fatal: pack is corrupted (SHA1 mismatch) fatal: index-pack failed -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple