X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=xOj4K2xbJL56m1Uob560OY99HLmnq2N2J5oueisUkn8HwJrBvZMmK
	9SWoID3mQO//b5zrppjLPwWsOETYNGYLIWSCEQsbAM5Wk8nvRoxKNi8A30GIVOKN
	UP+8MU1TZEekuqsh+C3z7CrOrGEWyRjxLisS8r7+SMZ1oBbrk0hILs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=MAJCz0es6lSDU+DxAgffRhl91dQ=; b=lfvsSdkU0tv6TStnX0ras+NwiMHf
	dj29zRcyg5nOOYYCLibejyyQuqMpHRCFVMNgj3VS/26WWjyrBCMgG41C3Kpx29IT
	LJoVyD4LICIRnuIUgMk4X5Dfpl+NwO0iVBWSpw8riXlVvxuA+7oPEchxygeM6pgw
	qJPIoJJmJWRLwtI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18hN+ZnLqqvWO+OkkJBM5Mz
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:50:53 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Add retry logic to rebaseall
Message-ID: <20140117175053.GA1134@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CACUHbYNK6e+NrBiNo9RUynqc=F39mLWnizQNFeU-DUSVj0rmeQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140116061906.GA1992@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140116085431.GB26205@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140117161333.GA59772@tishler.net> <CACUHbYP9zSQDENbt1tV9WY_jQx5ayxySfTVryt6u6nZAD5u88A@mail.gmail.com> <20140117174546.GB59772@tishler.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140117174546.GB59772@tishler.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:45:47PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:30:54AM -0500, David Boyce wrote:
>If you wrap rebaseall in its entirety and retry on failure until
>successful, then that will eliminate the "race condition" issue.
>
>If consensus thinks this change is generally useful, then rebaseall
>should be changed accordingly.  Otherwise, you can write a few line
>wrapper script to meet your special needs.

My 2c: I think it's likely that other people will find this kind
of functionality useful so, rather than introduce YA script to do
this, I think modifying rebaseall makes sense.  Then we can just
point people to using rebaseall -w.

It might even make sense to use this when setup.exe runs rebaseall.

Again, just my 2c opinion.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

