DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=DcbWZ/vvcJ+47VbHsolqgucPT3IslKzckpBqImsc59vUkoFYBgZr6
	OxDk1lyr/efvqe43SZ4pa2fWySb3C3fE0q6MwslsQESkr9waNSlgO8fZyzWewHDB
	5S3x/Zd2QoL94k86A8VnHN0Xl/DTW44oGULbJqK7qyjemp87vXyzt8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:03:43 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64
Message-ID: <20131119190343.GG2936@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <1384839303.14356.YahooMailNeo@web125203.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20131119100343.GA27525@calimero.vinschen.de> <528B93E6.3030802@etr-usa.com> <20131119171330.GF2936@calimero.vinschen.de> <528BAC3D.9070506@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yRA+Bmk8aPhU85Qt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <528BAC3D.9070506@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--yRA+Bmk8aPhU85Qt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 19 13:21, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like
> >GetVersionEx?  It returns different OS version numbers based on the
> >existence of a manifest in the executable.  How dense is that?
> >
> >So we have thousands of executables, none of them has a 8.1 manifest.
> >As a result, the uname() function returns OS versions 6.2 rather than
> >6.3.  Aaaaaargh.
> >
> >In cygcheck I added a patch to check dwBuildNumber this morning.  If
> >it's >=3D 9200, it's 8.1/2012R2, otherwise 8/2012.  But that doesn't
> >fix the OS version number of course.  Sigh.
> >
> >I'm going to tweak the OS version number and I'll do the same in
> >Cygwin's uname function as well.
>=20
> Good grief. I suppose I need to add something similar to
> /usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe...

Looks like it, yes.  What on earth were they thinking?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--yRA+Bmk8aPhU85Qt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
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=Nde/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yRA+Bmk8aPhU85Qt--