DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=ngl6OSLRGpYtuhjfSFhxTEYZRHvWKRN4VgfP0d8fzMPJ1ofh/u5rX
	xTRqpph+6DbzjIp5KZd4Nc+sqiB36oLKiqY4j4K4vw9rmbNuF2EN4Vy7pyBWACvx
	xprjeJh4pMbQXh3mDPTj9oL/ssof0a2Aer2/gp9aHKivppRa0lxErg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:52:21 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: gcc-4.8.2-1: /bin/gcc fails
Message-ID: <20131105095221.GA29697@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <52749A63.70803@acm.org> <20131102093635.GB25012@calimero.vinschen.de> <5275D706.5030207@users.sourceforge.net> <20131104114204.GB2731@calimero.vinschen.de> <5277B2F3.1060705@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <5278557C.2090205@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5278557C.2090205@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov  4 20:18, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir
> >aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd
> >and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate.  'Course, my
> >to-be-written update announcement will be a horrific, as current users
> >with customized configuration WILL have to modify their files (and setup
> >doesn't have an .rpmsave/.rpmnew mechanism).
> >
> >The currently-distributed version (and associated xinetd scripts and
> >sample inetd.d/ configuration files) puts them in /usr/sbin.
> >
> >If --libexecdir=3D/usr/lib, then...what?
> >
> >Should I revert to /usr/sbin for slave servers?  Use $libexecdir but
> >"know" that it is going to be /usr/lib and configure appropriately?  I'm
> >confused as to how to proceed here.
>=20
> Under the circumstances, configuring inetutils with
> --libexecdir=3D/usr/sbin makes the most sense.

Full ACK.  Otherwise you'd have to provide some script which tweaks an
existing /etc/inetd.conf to use the new paths.  Possible, but hardly
worth the effort.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=R+kV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--