X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=rBowac5fUh+xgGCP bZ78KsqWNHyTuOPmJjZFfMP2iBFG//szMYFn+EVag3n7AWQVVL5iqLLtda+u/pIK gzv22wAw1/v2hsIAjBUyk7Vel2m6QGSWkTqrGSi+6aqWyasLzkDh1n5O1IBbyK7e dIpGL9a1h8S/XOxMKWvTlJtOX+Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=aQlIEXjUEolBVbPPD0EaQ+ Gquo8=; b=Uo6hp3ccDRSEpKfQ3tHn/OH2MkuxzwLvaB4QxSGdBNORm+QcXz12zT roylrnjPLzYdkjgrogOS2PL9gxtZ+gpjljMzuCXGjueNmPDQAlXmB9qiHQMiAaOH 4zBdDB/CQ1SY2+waBZyM4dxOvVJWsMbU2MATNaYl2oQX3+50fvxJI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173013pub.verizon.net Message-id: <526047DB.60701@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:26:03 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: SSH Key Authentication is not working References: In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 10/17/2013 2:54 PM, Tadej Animalix wrote: > I see...I'll be checking for updates manually then.I thought this > system is email based, since the only way I know how to reply is via > email. Am I missing something? No, the list is email-based. However, since we prefer that replies remain on the list rather than (perhaps inadvertently) degenerating into a personal exchange, replies are automatically directed to the list. This makes sure that the exchange is shared with those on the list and archived for those that might be searching for a solution to a similar problem in the future. Despite being an email list, there is a newsgroup portal that gives you that alternate way of interacting with the list, if you prefer. See -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple