DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=N8mM17sviFEaoU10B15E3E4jFeWhvHcmbVAufS4ezPO
	0VNGfifhVo1KFnxhNCqPnKcoWtNcl2rOcwL7vKhLH7K344u2Fd7f9HAYIDFYvL5A
	yd0JoCqHDPjqsxYBM+cY3vQJJT+pIkSQkEFHe4W4xJ7AwzkMH5oKyqu6zH2CMp5Q
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <5254CD9B.1030002@etr-usa.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 21:29:31 -0600
From: Warren Young <warren@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin-L <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: checking in >= 256k file fatally corrupts rcs file
References: <20131008102204.GB9241@plunk.org> <525499E5.4090608@etr-usa.com> <20131009003055.GA30082@plunk.org> <5254B1C0.9020004@etr-usa.com> <20131009020813.GA15389@phoenix>
In-Reply-To: <20131009020813.GA15389@phoenix>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/8/2013 20:08, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> There was a discussion around March 27, 2012, about another change
> in the behavior of RCS between 5.7 and 5.8.  It appears that someone
> decided to make some sweeping "improvements" to RCS and broke a few
> things along the way.

GNU rcs 5.7 was released in 1995.  rcs 5.8 didn't come out until 2011. 
So yeah, 16 years of changes in one jump.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple