X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=X8SiHnKh9e9w/MK7DrHTggH8vTFqEYWlBegPz6in/fA
	bv4ThVecIFeBAL17XuSExhHHgNrsIMwBpyjqa4/xMAdzLsZXzgsORXMhnl9DOgxy
	CSJx5+6slClWAeIgDDOeOiljwdjxGFxmKVFyTUH7UQvT4nIUOuuXdMf5eXNwUOEI
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=snzOmipWF1gfyDvQKFvVq7M+ZPA=; b=NRzjr7TBC7yow76w/
	QpKOMMl4LRxcR0F1qSh5UnBH8N2pkJ6kaP+7FDtV31mdDjpYoxEq/zt2AOHPtFAP
	zGwSkPSBxECAJLzKoNYAewQMAKMHmec2P/H0P+xNpuKWIcHdQeSmRuL2SzoPiCbF
	9UfajFhvFjF/QLkoOlYMlCJ5gg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Message-ID: <5214F6DC.4000108@mailme.ath.cx>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:20:28 +0200
From: bartels <bartels@mailme.ath.cx>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130704 Icedove/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: mt and tar fail on LTO-5 drives
References: <20130819101917.GC18757@calimero.vinschen.de> <52124601.5000409@mailme.ath.cx> <20130819171203.GC31248@calimero.vinschen.de> <52126DBF.7040904@mailme.ath.cx> <20130820082905.GE31248@calimero.vinschen.de> <20130820090536.GF31248@calimero.vinschen.de> <521359A0.8030709@mailme.ath.cx> <20130820133251.GI31248@calimero.vinschen.de> <521377D9.8020309@mailme.ath.cx> <20130820144447.GA445@calimero.vinschen.de> <20130820203411.GN31248@calimero.vinschen.de> <CAKf2h5QBCROQif3uiq=q6kLq77MHaTBmCKhiR88Fkd4EN7YBWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKf2h5QBCROQif3uiq=q6kLq77MHaTBmCKhiR88Fkd4EN7YBWw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 08/21/2013 11:51 AM, Frank Fesevur wrote:
> 2013/8/20 Corinna Vinschen:
>>      This bug is present since 2004 and nobody noticed it.  I guess that
>>      means there aren't many people out there actually partitioning their
>>      tape drives...
> FYI: we use cygwin tar on a daily base to backup one server to
> LTO2-tapes, but I have never partitioned a tape. Wasn't even aware it
> could be done.

Partitioning was first introduced on LTO with LTO-5, accommodating LTFS.

- Bartels

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

