X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=yi2IklUGNnfoth/LHHPUH/4evos1Z9zQTPDpZylhoN1
	y2yiPb1gbj1yXuOaW2y0Qw5BUzTZm1YU5txnQtWUSLmLTc+uuaCtEWKrhfx9D/+s
	FaN/st/9e7U0K3aDDjX+8i450oPK9+0ipfBxUpA7RgW+zcTQ44YkIVJQNHiguMcM
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=5ODgGfBcQRCD/V2fcPjUzpuCGRI=; b=lI5q0L8ret/AdHZ7V
	PnuqkVkT3haPkC/Ar/BG4xZpr5dJAEdq7zHgDcLeEBFKeKQvoJTr2z3Rbm9l+1Ro
	UgUSN+h1kM8dQAjNfgZ45PTTtXP5xXOGPa6ec2uYZIwnV5gxxG9BfSXR0Z68OAxo
	p0hoJ14bI4WHVp9A4mrYGaHBsg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.149;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BLUPRD0512HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -5
X-BigFish: PS-5(z21eIzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail133-va3: domain of coverity.com designates 132.245.1.149 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.149; envelope-from=thonermann@coverity.com; helo=BLUPRD0512HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ;.outlook.com ;
Message-ID: <51F165FB.60300@coverity.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:52:59 -0400
From: Tom Honermann <thonermann@coverity.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Process command lines for Cygwin processes no longer viewable in Windows task manager as of Cygwin 1.7.21
References: <51F08F9D.6020606@coverity.com> <20130725082814.GA5124@calimero.vinschen.de> <51F1265B.1040704@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <51F133E4.6040506@coverity.com> <20130725151050.GA6932@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20130725152135.GA7761@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <51F147C7.6050206@coverity.com> <20130725171856.GB6019@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20130725171856.GB6019@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginatorOrg: coverity.com

On 07/25/2013 01:18 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
>> On 07/25/2013 11:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> It's not strace that's broken.  That's just a simple fix to the DLL.
>>>
>>> Actually, nevermind.  It's not a bug.
>>
>> Could you elaborate?  Prior to 1.7.21, strace provided the command line.
>>   As of 1.7.21 it doesn't.  That looks like a regression to me.
>
> The output that you're looking at says "Here's the command line that is
> being passed to CreateProcess".  Since there is now no command line the
> strace output is correct.

How does that make it not a regression?  The information used to be 
provided, now it isn't.

 From a user's perspective, I don't care what the implementation is. 
This *looks* broken.  Any user that relied on the information being 
present (which is a reasonable expectation given that the tool used to 
provide it and still attempts to) will consider this a regression.

I assert that expecting command lines for Cygwin processes to be 
viewable in tools like Windows Task Manager and SysInternals Process 
Explorer is a reasonable expectation - especially since they have been 
present there for many releases - again, going back to at least the 
1.5.x days.  This change may have been intentional, but from a user 
perspective, it has broken behavior that any Windows user would 
reasonably expect to be able to rely on.

Tom.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

