X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=fgMZS+z86KaCFVK3UkCOkRki7JhWD9zZA6l6wTBmTs/tJjXP6J3yQ
	7sRHsmMun4NZAq5col8wPjiXVnlsj3BcuJUxhsolgamvMyPBFPteM/bIn0wo4Drt
	fVYrDWZM6v2+wSyhmFOpq71FaBSApsrh+9yRovbAmYQo7glFjlSIv4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=HdGggfDBMaKt1TFaCs7gQ4pBdtI=; b=C5nVwvHZEYFpMw9YeMV6MOpLGv9w
	x/qjeIAZQzKNOQe7MHu//MdENUXiaBu8tNIlQjZH4WDU6g0qCxH14oNEPcO7aKcZ
	MIB1+SRKX8TvlA5Xmkx8DSD5khJNZmb2k7XL+USlMNn4g40aV/E73oOKQXINTF+d
	IZqIqXdbPOrhLi8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:09:44 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: base-files-4.1-2
Message-ID: <20130705120944.GA6219@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <51D6AEF1.8000404@cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51D6AEF1.8000404@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jul  5 07:33, Ken Brown wrote:
> base-files-4.1-2 was released as a test version in March 2012.  Is
> there a plan to promote it to current?  I'm not aware of any
> problems with it.

I just tried it on 64 bit, and I see some problems.

- /etc/postinstall/base-files-mketc.sh

    Only cosmetically:  The dos file warning when creating the service
    files is annoying.  Setting CYGWIN=nodosfilewarning might be a good
    idea.

- /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh

    Calls getfacl without path.  Assuming tcsh is your login shell, at
    the time this is run under tcsh, there's no default PATH set, so the
    script doesn't find the tools:

      /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found
      /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found
      /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found
      /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found
      /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 36: getfacl: command not found
      /etc/profile.d/1777fix.sh: line 46: touch: command not found

    Using the full path for all tools would fix that.

Other than that it's ok I think.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

