X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=XsFFel4kA7oAbk3FvKCwXxlmkNRyJiTjTiq7cdzkHf7UgGrSUnHc0
	sypqkgRW41e5MYml7bHFplqrZXMLFXMOK59ONk0fNi28y4S6nAcdlnjAwO+T3E7g
	NVT21SKX3phPh/HPdb/M3IGjflnjpe/NtwjGwpZZI7kOtB5SMQ0Eug=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=MXM75oF16EHJn7h1PTzkl64rO0o=; b=MKX84nH9MnXSjILDVDo7dSYFHBfZ
	UGsV3dZFi3RPYOWHhe0e6EBSoLmsIZvt0JTDk/Uh0OFWnwbKCCbTq2BI4opMNzL0
	ZPeHLC02PaZN5qq1leXkTyGp2xN5eVOFwZ3R819uk7gDltIe4GqmMutcffRL1Er4
	ehJkGW+qppJL/WM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18aJP9q98wb23zF8fbGRWQA
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 12:36:12 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: MSYS mode (continue)
Message-ID: <20130704163612.GA4729@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <20130704085847.GK5118@calimero.vinschen.de> <CABEPuQ+YxNF6LTAxRTVDQqQsKvGWGuaRxx1JAH62+wZZzgsC9w@mail.gmail.com> <CABEPuQKRz2kamtrbBF5MjxPiSRMxwJ7NhG6wRrtRXMoBm+quNg@mail.gmail.com> <20130704091632.GM5118@calimero.vinschen.de> <CABEPuQKb8ZFvA=5947_JNQ3xZUNi98FTkV=9Q04f8vMY-4q1pg@mail.gmail.com> <20130704101046.GN5118@calimero.vinschen.de> <CABEPuQJ2S5jUbJDS+XUhrvdLtu6t53QAvsmQ_q5RbvELZxHJhw@mail.gmail.com> <20130704103708.GA12995@calimero.vinschen.de> <CABEPuQ+iF265-SQzfLTmsBegG+BVjpLPowxRAH8ioWv1Us_iYg@mail.gmail.com> <20130704121617.GC12995@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130704121617.GC12995@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 02:16:17PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jul  4 13:45, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
>> 2013/7/4 Corinna Vinschen:
>> > On Jul  4 14:23, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
>> >> 2013/7/4 Corinna Vinschen:
>> >> > On Jul  4 12:37, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
>> >> >> 2013/7/4 Corinna Vinschen:
>> >> >> > On Jul  4 13:09, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
>> >> >> >>  struct utsname
>> >> >> >>  {
>> >> >> >> -  char sysname[20];
>> >> >> >> +  char sysname[21];
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We can't do that.  struct utsname is a publically facing structure.
>> >> >> > If you change the size, you're breaking compatibility with existing
>> >> >> > applications.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You should better drop some character from the string you want to enter
>> >> >> > here.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I can't drop any symbol from "MINGW32" word :)
>> >> >
>> >> > That's not 20 chars long.
>> >> >
>> >> Yes. But not only this need to be in 20 symbols. On cygwin 20 symbols is:
>> >>
>> >> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64\0
>> >>
>> >> But
>> >>
>> >> MINGW32_NT-6.1-WOW64\0
>> >>
>> >> is 21 symbol.
>> >
>> > Then drop the dash between "NT" and "6.1".  Or let's drop the WOW64
>> > since it's redundant anyway, given the content of "machine".
>> >
>> 
>> Let's drop it!
>
>I'm ok with that, but I think we should drop the "32" from MINGW in
>the first place.
>
>Does anybody rely on the "WOW64" in uname -s output?  I just checked
>the scripts in /bin in my installation and none of it seems to check
>for that info.
>
>And then again, it *is* redundant, given the uname -m output...

Can we back up a moment and discuss whether, regardless of string
length, this is the right approach?  This isn't what I'd envisioned
when I said "hooks".

Also can we please discuss this in the cygwin-developers and
cygwin-patches mailing lists?  That's what they are for.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

