DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=yLYlU+C3KEa/1zmILG6lD7Gu1Ej/q
	TCLteid4S/uVSvo2OQMXohxDhAexDiIzy7yew67TZBSplvx/XfURT8nxMS1KAdGV
	OrxVaTLHr1l4cSzADzwK7pETdY8c5T6MR1qOjZv1WwIcWCTF74JpFmUvyX+JdCck
	wz7LGHM73xL2bg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:52:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEDML181=7wPEXohFBJZU=K8Yw_tB5esWHGkZxd-6vz9-XWbKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Cygwin ccrypt differs to linux ccrypt
From: Chris Mingay <chris@chrismingay.co.uk>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi all,

Up to date Cygwin running on Windows 2003 Server with ccrypt version
1.10 (up to date)

Up to date Ubuntu 12.04 with ccrypt version 1.9 (up to date, according
to apt-get)

I've encrypted a file using ccrypt in Cygwin and I am unable to
decrypt it on the linux box (Ubuntu 12.04). I am able to decrypt it on
my Windows 7 box which also runs cygwin.

I'm looking for confirmation as to whether this might be considered
normal behaviour? I understand if this is the case, but I am unable to
find written confirmation anywhere regarding it.

Thanks
-Chris

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple