DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=dd5+sxbkY8C8AIno/lFAdO2Ko5aBrXogGd2B77/GQZ1
	UXwxjILUWFiNHL3sHfO/ygz3RcQsQLsU6+il+IzKKi2d3xks0mMV68vZ1dDzmEOm
	jzTQOX9okmUGNMisGXpexHsnKvsXzYuAGpFzUbfR71zqRbgZZr4ZvY8ro6AJf3ew
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <51BF6846.5080509@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:49:26 +0200
From: marco atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Feature request] Setup64.exe should respect more recent packages' version
References: <CAHYyVz6Euyswoakzc=-1cYN3K7OdbSTdtnUA2N_b0VntVKXk7Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CAHYyVz6GRYFUUW-dux6bEEARLvHuhmwXUDDrocw-EO+V55sCDA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHYyVz6J7Jw+B1jeV71q8VOpJ540r=6A8j1Yu-pQ05kx5KEZ9A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHYyVz6J7Jw+B1jeV71q8VOpJ540r=6A8j1Yu-pQ05kx5KEZ9A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Il 6/17/2013 9:27 PM, Vasiliy ha scritto:
> Ok, I understand, and, yes, it's also about setup.exe. That would be
> true if the package was marked as 'a test package', aka those marked
> '[test]' in setup.ini, but what if they were not? From my example bash
> 4.2 is not marked as [test] (I've changed 'installed.db' file
> accordingly), yet setup(64) downgrades it to 4.1
>
> Why not use two conditions instead of just one? Say, 'if package is
> more recent, and not marked as [test], then do not downgrade (keep)'.
>


0) please do NOT top post

1) installed.db have no info about test or current.
   That info is in setup.ini

2) about changing setup way of working, we need someone to write
    a patch. Please feel free to send your proposed one.
   I doubt it is on the top list of anyone else to change
   the current behaviour

Regards
Marco


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple