DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=FD1skB7Q+SNavgx3
	9ncR6u3lgEPvEGijIM/1dI5SrChdP8z0eWWqFL4g5QXi0MQfNrE1saIiHQ9cUtoN
	VIW/2j+VtfE8F+ire985dbC460ZRkfZV+fZfq18sUH09dSgv+CfIEYE73dGS2xB+
	VcXyLW5ESdMUODbg6E/MxuWRF/4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-id: <51BD4982.90606@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:13:38 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh@cygwin.com>
Reply-to: cygwin@cygwin.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Heimdal 1.5.2: "unknown mech-code 2529639054 for mech 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10"
References: <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C903ECD@EXMAIL.hrl.com> <51BB903E.9020408@cygwin.com> <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C903EDC@EXMAIL.hrl.com>
In-reply-to: <409A0E510096B044A0EE3778BB3F1F5C01379C903EDC@EXMAIL.hrl.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 6/14/2013 6:56 PM, Nogin, Aleksey wrote:
>> An easy way to help answer this question is to update your 'openssh'
>> (and 'cygwin') package(s) at least and see if that helps.  Allot has changed in the last year+.
>
> I've created a fresh installation of Cygwin, and see the exact same error:
>
> $ ssh -v XXXhostXXX
> OpenSSH_6.2p2, OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013
> [snip]
> debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password
> debug1: Next authentication method: gssapi-with-mic
> debug1:  Miscellaneous failure (see text)
> unknown mech-code 2529639054 for mech 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
>
> debug1: Delegating credentials
> debug1: Delegating credentials
> debug1: Authentication succeeded (gssapi-with-mic).
> [snip]
>
> I also observe that the ticket for the "host/XXXhostXXX" lacks the "forwardable" flag.

OK, maybe Yaakov has a thought.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple