X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=E2
	aZ3miV19alTj583T1U+JwHi8cge3AqLiqKUYdknK9ohYz1AUNF3pRnuvlBzWsTXh
	eKnQU9rOjqMvHroOUIvtiowD9L83f8K27Wnd/9zkQjKsIwSO0mxysGHPbxD4pIRZ
	jGYEnjoNRehBCiyo3zWpisZsfgfo5UcC8gxnm7h2c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=E4EWOagJ
	O07NycxSPgHB7/8VYLc=; b=yZIafHq/Op/Rew+zVL3BHriZuUtcCOhkenkO6a6L
	M9uU/HfHvPsMu9tbz2tuchaitQ+CZmWSxUF/y7FtO6DJJvqqL5lBA4mdPRugchbO
	8Vf2RsJSW+y1ncYqKrZ5WUwD7aBolyXXLJvuluuZU5ZP1e0/bpcT4yfEJdzgPsXe
	JTQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS,TW_YG autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.129.4 with SMTP id ns4mr21697206obb.22.1370611761003; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 06:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130607114015.GC32420@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <announce.20130605093949.GA3250@calimero.vinschen.de>	<51AF530A.7080306@shaddybaddah.name>	<20130605162825.GC3250@calimero.vinschen.de>	<CADSoG1u0101m66SbQbNPfW-J4B4o66EyQey2fdrWGy_Bya+1dg@mail.gmail.com>	<20130607114015.GC32420@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:29:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CADSoG1ttmDBbeW_aC2yBqHuKHuxmmLYAYeMpmJB-rSAj4nO8rA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 1.7.19
From: Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@gmail.com>
To: Andrey Repin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I do not think I explained myself properly, sorry: Cygwin would
previously read the
obcaseinsensitve value under Windows 2000 to emulate the case
insensitive behaviour of Windows XP and newer where obcaseinsensitive
was present in the registry.

The registry key does not represent the active state of case
sensitivity, so it is surely the wrong thing to query and show in
cygcheck as it only shows what the state is pending a reboot. Surely
it would be better now to query how the case sensitivity actually is
here and show that, and get rid of all references to
obcaseinsensitive, which is a configuration parameter and private
implementation detail of kernel?

Regards,

Nick

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

