DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=uvYDf68JiScbsJ6Du396SkXFfoCz6Fv7BrkTbjQSsj0
	5NF/BL109Ek/RZtq81cOmU6q431I066sUm/hzJeVSC+m2zhVlbiOXbTtAqjpvyVi
	g0NwDqG3ktAK5EqBCYzbp9sl2llBo+JBq1uI9aqpvmgRbOFfSUf2slKmJufELGE4
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <51B108BC.8090909@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:10:04 +0100
From: David Stacey <drstacey@tiscali.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [TEST] sqlite3-3.7.17-1 (Cygwin 1.7.19 locking feature)
References: <51ACF886.10301@etr-usa.com> <51AD3BB4.2010601@acm.org> <20130604084128.GB19572@calimero.vinschen.de> <51AF968E.1060707@etr-usa.com> <51AFBB47.4020806@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <51AFBB47.4020806@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 05/06/13 23:27, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 6/5/2013 12:50 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> The CYGWIN_SQLITE_LOCKING variable now has three possible states:
>>
>> CYGWIN_SQLITE_LOCKING=posix  -- same as before
>>
>> CYGWIN_SQLITE_LOCKING=posixmand -- equivalent to leaving it undefined in
>> the 3.7.17-1 build
>>
>> CYGWIN_SQLITE_LOCKING=AnythingElse -- BSD flock() based mandatory locking.
> I think the "AnythingElse" setting is what you intended for Subversion
> users that want to interoperate with Windows?
>
> The Subversion test suite passes with that setting. I don't know about
> issues with TortoiseSVN since I don't use it personally.

Ah, that'll be me then ;-)

I gave sqlite3-3.7.17-2 a try with Cygwin snapshot 2013-06-04, on a PC 
with TortoiseSVN 1.7.13. With CYGWIN_SQLITE_LOCKING set to AnythingElse, 
I ran a few tests (reverse merges, revert, etc.) that I thought would 
exercise the local database.

Whilst I haven't had time to put it through a very thorough examination, 
it all appeared to work just fine. I'll try to run some more tests tomorrow.

Thanks to Warren and Corinna for their considerable effort in getting 
this working.

Dave.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple