DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=n99rQx/g/T2s5Os3DyfTPcj4YPoyebvK78b00p6UIAffxawNBS3F0
	kkrqC0nObPcnSpxOwuW9O0DYBL1Z5R0g6yewr6DLKPwa8lhJLUKzRN9AyHwgqsjX
	GupZpxXi04vz27FNvF1z1tYcxzKGrPIvtu1fyjtk2VRq3PeCUksiAU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 11:12:40 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Please merge the patch posted in cygwin mail archive.
Message-ID: <20130602091240.GC13934@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <000601ce5f5b$fed0c300$fc724900$@ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000601ce5f5b$fed0c300$fc724900$@ne.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jun  2 15:39, Toshiaki Shimoi wrote:
> If right and available, please merge the patch into cygwin.
> 
> Mail archive title  libsigsegv progress: SIGSEGV and siginfo_t.si_addr
> URL  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-07/msg00817.html

The patch has gone lost accidentally, as far as I can see.  I
resurrected the patch for now, but ultimately it needs an internal
discussion with my co-maintainer since the surrounding code has changed
a lot in January.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple