DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=vVwbVo9pIdk7bYMboAg8hW08BDEhPJ4+ZsLMCVeeOuKbhZybpZG97
	Z+G3HJEHhMXJIDBnpyxGaZXQiCj438hMMhsnoV8BbnACgF35gE5h1XZw6KMw8hU2
	Sux0lH81DyQ8sYV16A9SywYX8qji53Njb5+L0sZvT9MWQ8LDu+iZ7k=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:42:22 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Patch for shutdown
Message-ID: <20130521094222.GF2406@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CAKf2h5QYs69d8RL647Fysji=fFCrEsg2HOMNenkjjcfd0fTJ6g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKf2h5QYs69d8RL647Fysji=fFCrEsg2HOMNenkjjcfd0fTJ6g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On May 20 13:40, Frank Fesevur wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
> 
> Since nobody made real objections about changing the short flag for
> hibernate from -h to -b to make room for -h for halt [1], I created a
> patch to change the shutdown program. The patch was created back in
> March, but with all your work being done on cygwin64, your holiday and
> myself being very busy with life it was held back.

I'm a bit reluctant as of the backward compatibility breakage.  What
if somebody uses shutdown in a script?  You know, starting a backup
in the evening and the last action of the script is to hibernate the
machine or something like that...

> There were no change to the shutdown CVS since then so here is that
> patch, including a changelog.
> 
> Note that I didn't change the programs version number in this patch. I
> don't know if changing an existing option would require/justify to
> change the version from 1.9 to 2.0 instead of simply to 1.10?

1.10 is fine I think.  Say, do you want to take over shutdown
maintainership?  It's an easy enough package to start with, it
builds fine on 32 and 64 bit, and you get the cygport configuration
"for free".  What do you say?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple