X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=YFdxh7aaguivBivJ+bgj4v1zbPNlCvxUDTp1rq07QInywrojs5UTu GknM9T/K60XdZAA6Z9o/IpkDX4uxt8Qo3RYqjQmwoyLBZwaYYto6kYP5MPDsKyJc axCONpaiTSnjmo5mMVp4j7IiiUp9KE5VxPUApp3m5nB+pQvBbM9210= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=cP/Hq7ipYxvXVTP24ydSvl7e0Vc=; b=A+T/pMqgNXWmos8Phqo3UpyuPMPm DhNBosRi3Yf1+uGYo8rMMPZVAvX94ILM9ugoIaP6JI5YjvNhEnWX0s/igTLLY4Ee xCZYxF35KUjyGdHaYrKoH8trZBYrTkDhLXvojAD7+d0tYi13aOEUoeclftEVA4qr ZdYYMynordAuI1Q= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RCVD_IN_SEMBACKSCATTER autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18znfWLEktj7zqV6ZrA/OC9 Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:09:42 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories Message-ID: <20130517180942.GA836@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin@samsung.com> <20130517083612.GE21752@calimero.vinschen.de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin@samsung.com> <20130517102655.GG21752@calimero.vinschen.de> <20130517145612.GC7087@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20130517152206.GL21752@calimero.vinschen.de> <20130517174857.GB660@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20130517180022.GQ21752@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130517180022.GQ21752@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:00:22PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On May 17 13:48, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote: >> >> >> Hello! >> >> >> >> >> >> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on >> >> >> > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html, >> >> >> > for instance. >> >> >> >> >> >> Heh... >> >> >> So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ? >> >> >> Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we have one use case... >> >> > >> >> >Not without lots of new code. >> >> >> >> So, maybe next Thursday? >> > >> >I would love to, but unfortunately I have to brush my cat on Thursday. >> >And I don't even have a cat. >> >> You're welcome to brush mine in that case. I don't have one either. >> >> So it sounds like we may have a feline inavailability deadlock. > >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK? I think it's ENOPURR . cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple