DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=jpYgA3bctgTrdCb2sNf+T8G5fL4QM474UjvcR2H3VCZnRU4f7Lisy
	RCD6b5Lbawo2sifTvO5eekmcnGBC26uP52D05isHTfVsxH4zMAs8z5QNsInIpmlW
	uRHBFz8DxwyaHslYXaw7gYRQIp9vNL93rZFNp5KQDjQUw93nNLMcYc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 20:00:22 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories
Message-ID: <20130517180022.GQ21752@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin@samsung.com> <20130517083612.GE21752@calimero.vinschen.de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin@samsung.com> <20130517102655.GG21752@calimero.vinschen.de> <20130517145612.GC7087@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20130517152206.GL21752@calimero.vinschen.de> <20130517174857.GB660@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130517174857.GB660@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On May 17 13:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> >> >>  Hello!
> >> >>  
> >> >> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
> >> >> > this list.  See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html,
> >> >> > for instance.
> >> >> 
> >> >>  Heh...
> >> >>  So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ?
> >> >>  Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we have one use case...
> >> >
> >> >Not without lots of new code.
> >> 
> >> So, maybe next Thursday?
> >
> >I would love to, but unfortunately I have to brush my cat on Thursday.
> >And I don't even have a cat.
> 
> You're welcome to brush mine in that case.  I don't have one either.
> 
> So it sounds like we may have a feline inavailability deadlock.

Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple